Dealing with a Bad Deal: Two Years of DR-CAFTA in Central America
Critics argue that for over a decade, the United States has been striving to create commercial inroads into Latin America
Read MoreCritics argue that for over a decade, the United States has been striving to create commercial inroads into Latin America
Read MoreOn August 19th, 2008, Taiwan’s new president Ma Ying-Jeou concluded his first trip to Latin America, one of the most
Read MoreBy light years, Washington traditionally has held the upper hand when it comes to foreign influence on Latin America. Its hemispheric power-advantage rests on decades of security, trade, investment, and ideological connections. However, the era of globalization is now tearing down many of the world’s hemispheric divides. Latin America is rapidly diversifying its international relations as major regional powerhouses, such as China, increase their presence in the region. Many view China’s growing influence in the western hemisphere as a challenge to the U.S.’s historic regional supremacy. However, the struggle for power and influence need not automatically reflect a winner-take-all competition, as both outside megaliths can benefit from China’s presence in Latin America.
China’s Economic Expansion
China’s phenomenal economic growth in the past quarter century has helped motivate Beijing to globalize its industries. From 1990-1998, China’s average annual economic growth rate was 11.2 percent, compared to the world’s average rate of 2.4 percent during the same time frame (China’s Average Economic Growth Rate in the 90s Ranked 1st in the World 2000) and the country’s growth rate is projected to remain above 8.5 percent for the next five years (Erikson 2008). Beijing’s economic ties to Latin America have witnessed comparable growth: from 1993 to 2003, China’s trade with Latin America increased by 600 percent (Xinhua News Agency 2004). Chinese president Hu Jintao set the mark for increasing trade with Latin America to $100 billion by 2010, a goal easily met when trade surged to $102.6 billion in 2007, which represents a 42.6 percent increase from 2006 (Erikson 2008).
For Full Article Click Here
This analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associate Jamie Heine.
U.S.–Mexico NAFTA Transportation Agreement Imperiled
The governing idea behind NAFTA is to remove trade restrictions so as to encourage the free-flow of goods and services across the North American continent. Along the U.S. – Mexican border, however, the reality is that the ground transportation of such goods remains highly congested and drawn out. Long-haul trucks from Mexico are restricted from operating in the U.S. except within designated commercial zones located in border-cities such as San Diego, El Paso and Brownsville. At these sites, the contents of a truck must be unloaded and transferred onto a domestic carrier in order to continue to their final destination. Authorities estimate that this obvious kink in the supply chain costs U.S. consumers $400 million a year.
For Full Article Click Here
This analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associate Chris Sweeney
Costa Rica and Guatemala are the latest to sign up with Petrocaribe
Nineteen Caribbean Basin nations now receive subsidized oil shipments from Venezuela
The future could not look brighter for Petrocaribe, a Venezuelan-led oil consortium that offers preferential financial terms on crude oil to signatory nations. In the past few of weeks, both Guatemala and Costa Rica have joined, bringing its total membership to nineteen. Costa Rican President Oscar Arias, otherwise an ally of the U.S., sent his official request on July 16 to join the organization, perhaps because the cost of importing oil has doubled between 2007 and 2008 to $2.8 billion. Guatemala, one of two Central American countries to have its own domestic oil supply, turned to Petrocaribe on July 11 in order to reduce its internal debt by curbing imported oil costs.
Subsidized Oil Shipments
Petrocaribe sells crude oil at market value, giving member states three months to pay 40 percent of the bill and 25 years to pay off the rest, at a one percent rate of interest. Because the conglomerate undersells the international price of oil per barrel by 23 percent, it is estimated that Guatemala will save $2,043,300 and Costa Rica $1,255,170 annually if the price of oil remains around $130 per barrel.
The first major disruption of the nine-month-old Costa Rican-Panamanian free trade agreement came on July 6, when approximately 200 truck
Read MoreYour article “It’s Official: The West Coast is a Mess” (TT, May 16) only scratches the surface of the issues
Read More